20CN网络安全小组论坛 - UNIX系统 - WindowstracertVSLinuxtraceroute

论坛: UNIX系统标题: WindowstracertVSLinuxtraceroute

作者: Root [wb8504]

论坛用户

Windows的tracert使用ICMP协议,Linux的traceroute支持TCP,UDP和ICMP协议，本案例即使指定ICMP协议后探测结果和Windows下结果依然不同，但程序用的协议时完全相同，感觉很费解，请各位指教,另外用 Linux的R测试了TCP 80和53,均卡在202.97.60.30后面那个好像是黑洞路由器的节点上

C:\>tracert -d 210.65.254.108

Tracing route to 210.65.254.108 over a maximum of 30 hops

1 14 ms 12 ms 13 ms 113.137.220.1
2 11 ms 12 ms 12 ms 222.91.159.46
3 11 ms 13 ms 12 ms 125.76.189.173
4 14 ms 12 ms 13 ms 117.36.122.197
5 14 ms 13 ms 12 ms 61.134.0.89
6 44 ms 45 ms 45 ms 202.97.48.125
7 43 ms 43 ms 41 ms 202.97.33.158
8 43 ms 47 ms 45 ms 202.97.60.158
9 54 ms 41 ms 41 ms 202.97.60.30
10 * * * Request timed out. //这一跳是黑洞路由器吗,linux的Ro怎么检测不到?
11 67 ms 62 ms 61 ms 210.65.254.108

Trace complete.

[root@matrix ~]# traceroute -n -I 210.65.254.108
traceroute to 210.65.254.108 (210.65.254.10, 30 hops max, 40 byte packets
1 192.168.0.1 0.717 ms 0.193 ms 0.471 ms
2 113.137.220.1 14.063 ms 15.313 ms 18.086 ms
3 222.91.159.46 20.947 ms 23.990 ms 26.802 ms
4 125.76.189.173 26.798 ms 31.711 ms 33.401 ms
5 117.36.122.197 37.196 ms 39.080 ms 41.254 ms
6 61.134.0.89 43.957 ms 48.026 ms 48.019 ms
7 202.97.48.125 77.651 ms 66.406 ms 69.343 ms
8 202.97.33.154 67.206 ms 202.97.33.150 68.140 ms 202.97.33.106 69.060 ms
9 202.97.60.197 73.119 ms 72.204 ms 71.194 ms
10 202.97.60.30 68.286 ms 67.243 ms 70.005 ms
11 210.65.254.108 92.421 ms 65.310 ms 66.192 ms

地主发表时间: 10-08-08 16:27

回复: NetDemon [netdemon]

ADMIN

值得深入研究下

B1层发表时间: 10-08-09 01:44

论坛: UNIX系统